Skip to main content

Leading the Blind

Before a death diverted my thoughts, I was planning to write about movements and leaders. I did not want to comment further on either side of the Lokpal debate, but it did get me thinking about how the drive had started in the first place, and why a man without any particular credentials can make us part of his crusade

About movements, leadership and what forms them.

A couple of weeks ago I came across two TED videos that seemed particularly relevant. In the first, Derek Sivers talks about how movements get started

The Anna story brought this to mind. A relatively ordinary, obscure man from well outside the centre of events; he probably started by dancing to his own tune, just on his own. He probably did not start with thoughts of followers or movements. Somewhere down the line, he got his first follower – maybe Arvind Kejriwal - and eventually a movement formed.

I found this rather personally interesting too. Of course, I have no intention of starting any movement that leads to fasting, but movements are not just of the political kind. When someone plucks you and puts you into a CXO slot, suddenly the ability to start a movement, to get your reportees to become your followers becomes an important skill. Two lessons – dance to your own tune, and treat your first follower as an equal.

So the question is, how do you get your first follower? Another TED video to the rescue; here Simon Sinek talks about why people buy into ideas.

The video talks about highly qualified Samuel Langley and the how the hicktown bicycle mechanic Wright Brothers beat him to it. Anna is a good parallel – what should be a job for politician looking to be elected finds far more success by an obstinate old man with no resume. People probably started following Anna because his why was distinct and believable. Its not surprising that people on the periphery are not quite sure of the exact whats and the hows – they're just attracted to Anna's convictions. Not dissimilar, it strikes me, to a person buying an iPhone; most people will never know what retina display really means or be able to give a reasoned technical comparison against (say) a Nokia.

Back to CXO. I must admit I find myself fairly clueless at times about leading a team. My leadership position is driven by designation – it makes me question what conviction I bring to it, and what people who finally aggregate around me see as the why.

Because, you see, like many swords, this one is two-edged too. Movements will happen, and followers we will get – they just may not be the kind we expect unless we know why we lead.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Outsourcing I–The "Why" Question

A little while ago, I was asked to give a presentation to CEOs on outsourcing. The audience wanted to know about adopting outsourcing for their companies; making use of its promise while avoiding its pitfalls. It seemed to me (unimaginatively, I must admit) that the whole thing boiled down to four fundamental questions - the why , the what , the who and the how . I decided to expand the presentation into a series of blog posts, one per question. The Why Question Why outsource? Given that a trillion-dollar industry has crowded a lot of people into Bangalore and made more than one driver rich, it seems a little late to ask this question. However, this isn't really about outsourcing being good or bad per se. Bloggers like us love to wallow in theoretical questions; companies usually want answers to more prosaic stuff. The question really is, why should a company be looking for an outsource partner ?   I've divided the universe into two simple flavours – Tactical and Str
2 comments
Read more

The Economics of 'E'

Mass market retailing is an expensive business. Rents, staff, inventory – the average brick and mortar retailer struggles along with barely visible net margins (spontaneous dancing is known to happen at 5%). With thousands of stores, hundreds of warehouses and over two million employees, Wal-Mart has in the last five years managed a profit margin of just 3.5%. The story is no different for any other major brick & mortar retailer, American or desi. Cool-kid-on-block Internet retail, on the other hand, thumbs a nose at the old-fashioned ways and gives the distinct impression that it can do much better. There's just one small problem. The bellweather Amazon, for all its buzz, seems unfortunately to have done much the same (indeed, a little less at 2.48% over the same period); nor has any other sizeable virtual retailer done much different. What gives? The law of unintended consequences, that's what. Lets take two of the most discussed items – rent and inventory. Mind you, thi
2 comments
Read more

Outsourcing III–The "Who" Question

A little while ago, I was asked to give a presentation to CEOs on outsourcing. The audience wanted to know about adopting outsourcing for their companies; making use of its promise while avoiding its pitfalls. It seemed to me (unimaginatively, I must admit) that the whole thing boiled down to four fundamental questions - the why , the what , the who and the how . I decided to expand the presentation into a series of blog posts, one per question. The Who Question Once you've clarified why you're looking for an outsource partner and also which pieces to outsource, you're faced with the next big question – who? What should you look for in your potential outsourcing partner? The choice, I put to you, comes down to four linked characteristics. Ability The first characteristic, of course, is ability. A vendor cannot be under consideration at all if the basic ability to handle whatever you plan to outsource is not present. This is not always an easy thing to judge, especi
1 comment
Read more