Skip to main content

A Matter of Consequence

While the corruption movement rages on, a personal note of sadness intruded yesterday.

At breakfast, my mother casually mentioned to me an accident where a coconut tree had fallen on someone, killing him; we dwelled briefly on the freak, tragic nature of it – trees don't usually fall on people in Mumbai, coconut trees even less so – but I didn't think very much of it then. The next morning, a large obituary notice abruptly made the matter more personal.

The person in question was Ved Prakash Arya.

I have known Ved, on and off, from my early IBM days; he was a customer then. We met again a decade later; him as COO of Pantaloon Retail (Future Group was still in the future) and me as a newly minted CEO of subsidiary company Futurebazaar. I can safely say that I would not have made it through my first year without help, and a key person providing the steadying hand was Ved. He was effectively my boss, but more than formal interaction Ved's off-the-cuff feedback and pointers were critical in keeping my head above water and avoiding some imminent rookie mistakes. When he left Pantaloon to start his own fund, it was a big and disorienting loss. He continued to give me occasional advice, but our contacts grew less frequent – from nearly daily to once in a while.

I always wanted to emulate Ved. He was marginally older than me, came from a background of no particular priviledge, and went through a similar academic journey. However, he had something that people start dreaming of in their teens and usually give up only in their deathbed. Ved was just forty two, but he had already achieved  some measure of what I'm still hoping I will achieve.

Ved, you see, was a person of consequence.

Consequence is harder than success, than money, than power. Consequence is the difference between Steve Jobs and the average CEO, between Anna's lakhs of followers and the average politician's lakhs of votes, between a person who merely achieves a milestone and a person who influences in some way the events that follow him. Many make money or gain power, few gain consequence.

Ved materially impacted people; many emulated him, his methods, tried to copy his achievements. We have been tragically reminded how fragile life is, how temperamental the nature of the universe. Ved died young, but he became a person of some consequence well before he died. I hope I achieve some measure of what Ved did before, inevitably, some form of coconut tree strikes me down.

Goodbye, Ved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Outsourcing I–The "Why" Question

A little while ago, I was asked to give a presentation to CEOs on outsourcing. The audience wanted to know about adopting outsourcing for their companies; making use of its promise while avoiding its pitfalls. It seemed to me (unimaginatively, I must admit) that the whole thing boiled down to four fundamental questions - the why , the what , the who and the how . I decided to expand the presentation into a series of blog posts, one per question. The Why Question Why outsource? Given that a trillion-dollar industry has crowded a lot of people into Bangalore and made more than one driver rich, it seems a little late to ask this question. However, this isn't really about outsourcing being good or bad per se. Bloggers like us love to wallow in theoretical questions; companies usually want answers to more prosaic stuff. The question really is, why should a company be looking for an outsource partner ?   I've divided the universe into two simple flavours – Tactical and Str...

The Economics of 'E'

Mass market retailing is an expensive business. Rents, staff, inventory – the average brick and mortar retailer struggles along with barely visible net margins (spontaneous dancing is known to happen at 5%). With thousands of stores, hundreds of warehouses and over two million employees, Wal-Mart has in the last five years managed a profit margin of just 3.5%. The story is no different for any other major brick & mortar retailer, American or desi. Cool-kid-on-block Internet retail, on the other hand, thumbs a nose at the old-fashioned ways and gives the distinct impression that it can do much better. There's just one small problem. The bellweather Amazon, for all its buzz, seems unfortunately to have done much the same (indeed, a little less at 2.48% over the same period); nor has any other sizeable virtual retailer done much different. What gives? The law of unintended consequences, that's what. Lets take two of the most discussed items – rent and inventory. Mind you, thi...

Pick Up and Cash

In my last post , I talked about how giving up some of the trappings of physical retail is not without its costs. This post is about the flip side of that coin – in a way. What caught my eye was Wal-Mart's new facility allowing customers to pay cash for online purchases. The announcement (made a little over two months ago) comes with a twist unfamiliar to those Indians happy with cash on delivery – this one requires you to visit a Wal-Mart store to pay cash for what you bought on the Internet. After same-day pickups, this seems Wal-Marts latest attempt at that famous silver bullet that was supposed to defeat Amazon – multi-channel. Online shopping is still a small percentage of worldwide retail, but it is expanding far faster than the boring brick kinds. Profits may not be stellar, but growth certainly is - Amazon is climbing the ladder faster than an MBA on steroids. And physical retailers are feeling – if not the heat, then at least the smell of smoke from the flames. After ye...